Monthly Archives: June 2011

NATO Warning: Bombs may hit any place at any time!

Posted on by
Reply

Libya. Remember how we were going to help the population get rid of a dictator? With kinetic action and humanitarian bombs filled with Depleted Uranium no less.
I don’t know about you but I fail to see how that would help a population to feel free having their cities bombed and their children killed.

Here are some links to interviews with Cynthia McKinney (former US congress woman) Wayne Madsen (Independent investigative journalist) and Webster Tarpley (economist, writer and independent investigative journalist) who all did what our MSM and politicians should do: They went to Libya and asked questions and guess what, They found a population in peril and in support of their leader. They wanted to know why we were attacking them when they had never attacked us!! Funny that.

Fukushima: World's Worst Industrial Disaster Reveals How Nation States Are Powerless to Protect Us from Advanced Technology

Posted on by
Reply

To understand the title of this article you have to know about what is generally known as media gatekeepers. Gate keepers of both the left and the right persuasion are entities which make sure that some subject will not be touched upon and that others will be emphasized thus making sure our thinking gets directed towards goals the owners of said media have in mind.

The difference between media senders who propagandise and those who gate-keep is subtle. The more obvious propaganda will be more readily recognised as such like FOX for example were as those engaged in gate-keeping generally incite frustration and incomprehension about why they don’t seem to talk about certain subjects which for all intends and purposes are very much in need of being addressed.

Some of those subjects are:

One of the most under reported issues is without a doubt the efforts of a small, very rich and powerful elite to install a global governance. Most people when asked would like to stay the citizen of the country they live in with representatives they elect and they would reject the notion of the entire globe to be ruled by a small unelected group of very rich and very powerful people.

In order to achive their goal they need to operate by stealth and by manipulation so if in one of the media financed by a known gatekeeper financier states that it is not the efforts of TEPCO the owner of Fukushima nuclear power plant which are sorely lacking but the Government of Japan and in one foul swoop makes a case for the abolition of Nation states you might well ask yourself if this is an effort to use the disaster of the three meltdowns at  the plant as a scaremongering exercise to hurdle us faster towards accepting a global governance.

If that is the case I urge you to ponder the following. If a Nation state is incapable to protect you from a nuclear disaster than what do you expect a small unelected elite ruling this planet to do if somewhere along the line a next nuclear disaster awaits.

——————————————-

The nuclear crisis brings key questions about our system of social organization to the fore, and the answers may influence what the world looks like in the future.
June 27, 2011
 The day after the disastrous level-nine earthquake that triggered the tsunami and the Fukushima nuclear crisis, March 12, an Israeli expert on air quality and poisoning, Professor Menachem Luria, told Israeli Channel 2: “From what we can gather, this disaster is even more dangerous than Chernobyl.”

At the time, his was a minority opinion in the scientific community; very few believed that a nuclear accident as bad as the 1986 meltdown in Ukraine would occur again. “I think that’s basically impossible,” said James Stubbins, an expert at the University of Illinois, and many others agreed.

Yet, as we are now slowly coming to realize, Fukushima is worse than Chernobyl. In a revealing recent feature article published by al-Jazeera, Dahr Jamail conveys the comments of Arnold Gundersen, a senior former nuclear industry executive in the United States.

Read more


The end of the Maori party? It should or congratulations to Hone Harawira

Posted on by
Reply

When the Maori party announced it was going into government with National I called them traitors to their people and I said that everything that was coming to them was deserved and none of it was good.

When Hone broke with the Maori party he did the right thing and his win yesterday was well deserved. It is uplifting to see that even with all the media manipulation and smear campaigns against him he won and in doing so may have signed the death warrant of the Maori party and rightfully so.

I called it in November 2008 and he has my vote if he ever wants to stand Nationally for workers and the people and Maori issues.

Hone, well done, kia ora.

 

 

 

China, barkeepers and bar tabs or why China will collapse just like the rest of us

Posted on by
Reply

About two and a half years ago when I started to tell people that we were going to see the worst economic collapse this world has ever seen people laughed and told me that even IF America were to collapse there would always be China.

I told them that they were delusional and here is why: China is like a bar keeper in a bar with only one real customer, America. America drinks and eats like a Templar and while at the beginning he always paid his bill the last couple of decennia he has been putting his out of control consumption on the tab. In the mean time China has been doing the same with all the other countries because he needed to keep stocked up to cater to his customers rapacious appetite.

China positive with the US, negative with the rest of the world!

So now that America is collapsing as I was predicting years ago China is waking up to the fact that America is never going to be able to pay its humongous tab and while it tries to keep going by extending loans and bailouts to its local population the writing is on the wall. Unrest is rising in China and will likely increase.

When inevitably America defaults so will China and the rest of the world. There is just no other way out.

Here is how Washington’s blog puts it:

It was tempting to believe that China was different.

With its command and control economy with some of the trappings of free market capitalism, trillions in reserves, and abundant natural resources, many thought that China would “decouple” from the Western world’s problems and sail into a prosperous future.

However, despite its long history, exotic names and seemingly strong position, China cannot avoid the rules of economics which have applied to all countries throughout history.

Corruption and Phony Bookkeeping

Corruption and the failure to follow the rule of law is one of the main factors which has dragged down the American economy.

The fact that – according to the Chinese central bank – Chinese officials stole $120 billion and fled the country does not auger well for China.

Scandals among various Chinese companies are not helping, either.

And then there are the made up statistics. As Warren Hatch of Catalpa Capital Advisors notes:

As Li Keqiang, the vice premier and heir-apparent to Wen Jiabao, laconically remarked to the US ambassador a few years ago, most of the statistics in China are “for reference only.”

And Charles Hugh Smith argues:

Read more

 

On silver iodide, weather modification and butterflies also known as the best weather money can buy.

Posted on by
11

Update: I was asked if I could link to the information about the volcano emitting more CO2 in 4 days than human kind in five years. This is incorrect. I meant to say this:

It appears that the Chilean Volcano barfed more CO2 into the atmosphere than needed to negate the entire attempt of mankind to reduce carbon exhaust in the last five years so what are we going to do?

As I clearly states It appears that way. I am not a scientist and I feel therefore not entitled to make statements as facts in the matter. I am however critical of the Climate change doctrine as I explain below.

—————————————————–

Yesterday for the first time a discussion erupted on weather modification on the Standard. What’s more it was the first time I came out there as a climate change sceptic. That doesn’t mean I don’t think that we don’t have huge problems with pollution, destruction of precious habitats and other assorted and despicable acts of disrespect for the planet we call our home but I don’t think that Carbon pollution is one of them and I don’t think that paying taxes to rich pricks is the solution even if Carbon was  problem.

(Original text corrected above) For example it appears that the eruption of the Chilean Volcano barfed more CO2 into the atmosphere to negate the entire attempt of man kind in the last five years so what are we going to do? Extract huge amounts of money from the Chilean people for allowing the volcano to erupt?

My prime beef with the whole climate change debate is that the real issues are being obscured by technology that quite understandably is not something the people who apply it are willing to talk about in great detail. This technology is called weather modification. One of the techniques to modify weather with is called cloud seeding. Cloud seeding shows up as trails in the sky and to separate them from from the Contrails or condensation trails which are vapour trails or artificial clouds that are the visible trails of condensed water vapour made by the exhaust of aircraft engines people have taken to naming them Chemtrails or Chemical trails.

Whenever you talk about these “chemtrails” people tend to go a bit funny and gigly and they look at you with the stare they save for people they consider to be cooks so so if and when a pilot is willing to admit in an interview that he actually partakes in the activity called cloud seeding that is big news. So here is a video recording of the voice of a gentleman who talks freely about his endeavours as a cloud seeding pilot.

For those of you who think that silver iodide is a harmless substance here is the wiki entry on it. Is Weather Modification. Inc. the only company willing to seed our atmosphere with toxins to please people with enough money with the weather they would like to see above their little patch? Well here is an image of the known weather modification companies in the West of the US and Canada.

http://thestandard.org.nz/its-begun/#comments

 

 

"Not even Jesus could reverse the decline in the US"

Posted on by
Reply

According to economist and writer William Engdahl we are living through an event which occurs once every 500 years or so.


The event? A total collapse of an empire, the US empire to be precise of which we are a part whether you like it or not. He reckons not even Jesus could resurrect the carcass of the most powerful empire to date. If that doesn’t scare the beJesus out of you I don’t know what will!!!

Are you ready for WWIII: They eye of Mordor roves to Syria… and beyond.

Posted on by
Reply

Update: If you are easily grossed out maybe this is not the link for you but if like me you are driven by the need to know and want to know what happens if you bomb a library then perhaps it is the link for you.

We “the West” are committing atrocities hidden behind the words “Kinetic military action” and Humanitarian aid in the form of bombs and we accept that it is done in our name because the people it happens to are far away in countries we don’t know and who have brown skins and a religion we are afraid off.

It is that simple.

Yesterday the NATO had to admit that civilians had been killed in a bombing raid.

Euphemistically called Kinetic Military action and humanitarian aid to liberate the Libyan people it should not surprise anyone that civilians would be the victim of what amongst us commoners is normally called illegal war of aggression and conquest which was declared the biggest war crime of all.

They were not the only ones nor will they be the last. Like in any war culture is being destroyed. Libraries, schools and make no mistake Tripoli is an ancient city and so are most of the other major cities and bombing them will inevitably damage the leftovers of Phoenician, Roman and Bedouin culture.

Depleted Uranium will make sure of that. Bunker busters and tomahawk missiles are always made with DU heads, make no mistake about that, which means that Tripoli a city of more than 1 million people the size and population of Auckland will be for the next 4.5 billion years spawning deformities amongst it’s infants and cause cancer and sickness defeating any pretence of “humanitarian” intervention.

Yemen is being bombed as I write this and according to reports coming from army personnel at ford Hood Troops are being prepared to invade Libya in contravention of the UN resolution which explicitly forbade boots on the ground and the congress has been effectively ignored in it’s wishes to have the law with regards to the president needing approval to wage war respected.

Syria is next. the European Union has put economic sanctions in place and US war ships have been moved to the coast of Syria. Anyone with the eyes to see knows what happened to Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

One definition of a World war is that the population of two or more continents must be affected over a period of several years and I dare say that with the Asian, European, African and American continents being involved and affected we have come perilously close.

Parliament Square anti-war protester Brian Haw, 62, dies

Posted on by
Reply

A true hero. RIP.

Over the last decade he fought off many an attempt to remove him from Parliament Square.

But in the end it was only death that succeeded in ending Brian Haw’s long campaign.

Britain’s most famous protester died over the weekend after losing his battle with lung cancer.

Tributes poured in yesterday to the figure who became a familiar face to many MPs and tourists over the last 10 years when he lived in a tent on the square.

The 62-year-old first pitched his tent on the green opposite the Houses of Parliament in protest against the UK’s policy in Iraq and elsewhere on June 2, 2001.

It began as a response to economic sanctions and British and American bombing raids on Iraq, but his angry messages daubed on hand-written posters grew after the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq.

His tent and collection of horrific pictures of war victims, accompanied by slogans like ‘baby killers’, offended many who demanded he be removed from the hallowed ground where the statues of Winston Churchill and Sir Robert Peel stand.

But this month he marked ten years living on the square.

Read more:

Bilderberg 2011: The Rockefeller World Order and the "High Priests of Globalization"

Posted on by
16

Of course not a lot of people here even know about the existence of the Bilderberg group. But they should because their ambassador to the US is a Bilderberg man. He was cordially invited to take part in the 2000 Bilderberg meeting and once you’re in your in. He is the link with Bilderberg and John Key to make just one not to fine a point. Michael Moore, labour party man, ex-finance minister, WTO CEO and one time prime minister today is serving as the ambassador to the US and him together with John Key and Don Brash are the three finance guys guiding New Zealand towards a new World Order.

The title of Mike Moore’s latest book? Saving Globalisation. I rest my case!

—————————————

by Andrew Gavin Marshall

To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn’t go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless. So we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing.[1]

- Denis Healey, 30-year member of the Steering Committee of the Bilderberg Group

The ‘Foundations’ of the Bilderberg Group

The Bilderberg Group, formed in 1954, was founded in the Netherlands as a secretive meeting held once a year, drawing roughly 130 of the political-financial-military-academic-media elites from North America and Western Europe as “an informal network of influential people who could consult each other privately and confidentially.”[2] Regular participants include the CEOs or Chairman of some of the largest corporations in the world, oil companies such as Royal Dutch Shell, British Petroleum, and Total SA, as well as various European monarchs, international bankers such as David Rockefeller, major politicians, presidents, prime ministers, and central bankers of the world.[3] The Bilderberg Group acts as a “secretive global think-tank,” with an original intent to “to link governments and economies in Europe and North America amid the Cold War.”[4]

In the early 1950s, top European elites worked with selected American elites to form the Bilderberg Group in an effort to bring together the most influential people from both sides of the Atlantic to advance the cause of ‘Atlanticism’ and ‘globalism.’ The list of attendees were the usual suspects: top politicians, international businessmen, bankers, leaders of think tanks and foundations, top academics and university leaders, diplomats, media moguls, military officials, and Bilderberg also included several heads of state, monarchs, as well as senior intelligence officials, including top officials of the CIA, which was the main financier for the first meeting in 1954.[5]

The European founders of the Bilderberg Group included Joseph Retinger and Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands. Prince Bernhard had, incidentally, been a member of the Nazi Party until 1934, three years prior to his marrying the Dutch Queen Juliana, and had also worked for the German industrial giant, I.G. Farben, the maker of Zyklon B, the gas used in concentration camps.[6] On the American side, those who were most prominent in the formation of the Bilderberg Group were David Rockefeller, Dean Rusk (a top official with the Council on Foreign Relations who was then the head of the Rockefeller Foundation), Joseph Johnson (another Council leader who was head of the Carnegie Endowment), and John J. McCloy (a top Council leader who became Chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank in 1953 and was also Chairman of the Board of the Ford Foundation).[7]

The fact that the major American foundations – Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Ford – were so pivotal in the origins of the Bilderberg Group is not a mere coincidence. The foundations have, since their founding at the beginning of the 20th century, been the central institutions in constructing consensus among elites, and creating consent to power. They are, in short, the engines of social engineering: both for elite circles specifically, and society as a whole, more generally. As Professor of Education Robert F. Arnove wrote in his book Philanthropy and Cultural Imperialism:

Foundations like Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Ford have a corrosive influence on a democratic society; they represent relatively unregulated and unaccountable concentrations of power and wealth which buy talent, promote causes, and, in effect, establish an agenda of what merits society’s attention. They serve as “cooling-out” agencies, delaying and preventing more radical, structural change. They help maintain an economic and political order, international in scope, which benefits the ruling-class interests of philanthropists and philanthropoids – a system which… has worked against the interests of minorities, the working class, and Third World peoples.[8]
These foundations had been central in promoting the ideology of ‘globalism’ that laid the groundwork for organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Group to exist. The Rockefeller Foundation, in particular, supported several organizations that promoted a ‘liberal internationalist’ philosophy, the aim of which:

was to support a foreign policy within a new world order that was to feature the United States as the leading power – a programme defined by the Rockefeller Foundation as ‘disinterested’, ‘objective’ and even ‘non-political’… The construction of a new internationalist consensus required the conscious, targeted funding of individuals and organizations who questioned and undermined the supporters of the ‘old order’ while simultaneously promoting the ‘new’.[9]

Read more