This is part three of the presentation for a new investigation into the collapse of Building 7 which collapsed into its own footprint in 6.5 seconds on 5:20 pm on 9/11.embedded by Embedded Video
A couple of weeks ago NIST (National Institute for Science and Technology) lost a court case. They did not want to release material filmed and shot on 911 but the international Institute for 911 research went to court over a FOIA (freedom of information request) and won. Among others this brought back into the public eye a video shot with a FLIR camera. This is a camera that films infrared waves rather than a “normal” picture and the lady who shot it just happened to be working at the scene that day.
Now any of you who have had their house checked for humidity problems can vouch for the amazing exact nature of these recordings and in this case is proves something does not add up in the official CT.
The official theory has us believing that the steel in the buildings heated up to the point of buckling thus allowing the two towers to collapse into freefall speed into their own foot print but this video proves without a shadow of doubt that the steel was not even remotely heated up so if the buildings could not have collapsed due to the heating of the internal steel structure than what did?
In light of the fact that NIST is an institute that answers to Bush or the next president only and that NIST scientists are specialists in Nano-thermite and a such knew very well where not to look, the fact that they where unable to come up with another explanation about the freefall speed collapse of the WTC 7 building is remarkable.
NIST the official investigative body for the Physical events of 911 has after 7 years of procrastination finally released it’s final report on the collapse of building 7. The building collapsed in the late afternoon in New York into a pyroclastic dust cloud at freefall speed.
In the entire history of steel framed buildings only three buildings collapsed. Not only did they collapse, they collapsed in freefall speed into pyroclastic dust clouds in total violation of Newtons laws of physics.
Patty Casazza, Monica Gabrielle, Mindy Kleinberg and Lorie Van Auken all lost their husbands on 911. Thanks to these strong and courageous women the US Government was finally forced to investigate the events of 911. The 911 commission was formed and they “investigated” the events of 911 with the forgone conclusion that 19 hijackers of Arab descent had perpetrated the crime. They excluded all witness statements on explosives, explosions in the buildings preceding the impact of the planes and never even mentioned the collapse of building 7. Lat month the NIST concluded that simple office fires had caused the thermal expansion of one huge beam causing the collapse of WTC7 which had been reinforced twice to withstand a nuclear blast into its own footprint in 6.5 seconds.
This of course should have massive repercussions about the safety code for highrise buildings. We will never know when one of them is going to come down in freefall speed and a pyroclastic flow if an office fire can do that to a building. Yet, no advise is forth coming. This is what Patty, Monica, Mindy and Lorie had to say about it:
For Immediate Release
September 26, 2008
NIST has finally released its long awaited investigative report regarding the collapse of World Trade Center 7. WTC 7 was the third building in the World Trade Center Complex to collapse at 5:20 PM on September 11, 2001. However, this building was not hit by an airplane.
As family members of 9/11 victims, we were extremely interested in the findings of this report. We had hoped that NIST’s report would serve to explain the cause of a total collapse of a conventional steel building and be able to refute the rampant conspiracy theories. We also hoped that this report, in conjunction with NIST’s final reports on WTC 1 and 2, would offer recommendations for improved building and fire codes to ensure public safety in ALL buildings going forward.
While we feel that technical experts should review, critique and replicate the findings within this report, we also feel that we must express our concerns based on public comments by NIST regarding their findings.
NIST’s explanation that an entirely new Phenomenon “Thermal expansion” due to small office fires caused the most fortified building in New York to collapse in the freefall speed of 6.5 seconds beggars believe. But it gets worse; Shyam Sunder the lead investigator answered when questioned whether they had investigated the possibility that the building had been brought down with a controlled demolition that they had dismissed that idea because the explosion would have been too loud and nobody had come forward testifying that there had been explosions.
While there is ample video material and testimony that indeed explosion occurred just before and while the building collapsed into a pyroclastic flow, there is something even more disconcerting than this obvious lie.
Article continues below.
Thermite is a military grade incendiary and explosive. It is used to blow up buildings and it is considerably less noisy than other more conventional explosive. Why is this important ? Well, NIST’s scientists should have investigated the use of this material and they didn’t. Why should they at least have considered the use of thermite? Because NIST was very much involved in the development of Thermite.
Is someone beside me beginning to have a problem with the obvious conflict of interest with NIST investigating the WTC 1,2 and 7 collapses while they might have been involved in the development of exactly the kind of explosives that might have been used to blow up these buildings. This fact alone means that their entire investigation of the events of 911 should be disregarded. We need a new and independent investigation of the events of 911.
The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites
Kevin R. Ryan, 7-02-08
“Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? … NIST did not test for the
residue of these compounds in the steel.”
NIST Responses to FAQs, August 2006
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has had considerable
difficulty determining a politically correct sequence of events for the unprecedented
destruction of three World Trade Center (WTC) buildings on 9/11 (Douglas 2006, Ryan
2006, Gourley 2007). But despite a number of variations in NIST’s story, it never
considered explosives or pyrotechnic materials in any of its hypotheses. This omission is
at odds with several other striking facts; first, the requirement of the national standard for
fire investigation (NFPA 921), which calls for testing related to thermite and other
pyrotechnics, and second, the extensive experience NIST investigators have with
explosive and thermite materials.
One of the most intriguing aspects of NIST’s diversionary posture has been their total
lack of interest in explosive or pyrotechnic features in their explanations. Despite the
substantial evidence for the use of explosives at the WTC (Jones 2006, Legge and
Szamboti 2007), and the extensive expertise in explosives among NIST investigators
(Ryan 2007), explosives were never considered in the NIST WTC investigation. Only
after considerable criticism of this fact did NIST deign to add one small disclaimer to
their final report on the towers, suggesting they found no evidence for explosives.
The extensive evidence that explosives were used at the WTC includes witness testimony
(MacQueen 2006), overwhelming physical evidence (Griffin 2005, Hoffman et al 2005,
Jones and Legge et al 2008) and simple common sense (Legge 2007). There is also
substantial evidence that aluminothermic (thermite) materials were present at the WTC
(Jones 2007), and the presence of such materials can explain the existence of intense fire
where it would not otherwise have existed. Additionally, despite agreement from all
parties that the assumed availability of fuel allowed for the fires in any given location of
each of the WTC buildings to last only twenty minutes (NIST 2007), the fires lasted
much longer and produced extreme temperatures (Jones and Farrer et al 2008).
Go to original
The White House and U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) are urging Americans to return to the stone age for their own safety.
“After discovering that ‘thermal expansion’ of steel from a low-temperature fire led to the collapse of World Trade Center building 7,” said NIST spokesperson Noh Wei, “we started realising that other metal objects might also be at risk”.
So NIST scientists tested other metallic objects using state-of-the-art computer models. The models predicted that every oven and barbecue in the country could disintegrate at any time, leading to a progressive collapse of entire houses.
“We also determined that car engines, airplane engines, and boat engines could all suddenly fail due to thermal expansion,” said Wei. “Indeed, we soon realised that almost all industrial processes could lead to catastrophic failure, other than, perhaps, those used in freezers.”
White House spokesman Phil Johnson agreed, saying
“Once you understand this principle of thermal expansion, you start to realise that even household shower heads and faucets are dangerous. The hot water flowing through them could wreak havoc. The President is committed to leading the way back to a safer time, and a return to proven, traditional materials – which may not be flashy like metal – but remain rock-solid even when warm.”
A Fact Sheet from NIST provides recommendations and safety guidelines based on the new thermal expansion discoveries:
Is Metal Safe?
While it was previously assumed that metal was safe, scientists have now discovered that steel and other metals can suddenly fail due to exposure to heat. NIST urges everyone to stop using metal, and to reassess possible replacements with stone materials.
Sunlight can warm up metal. Therefore, no metal should be used where any sun exposure is possible.
If people choose to continue using metal, we urge them to live underground, to protect against the dangers of sunlight.
It really is that ridiculous. The NIST rapported earlier this week that due to the thermal expansion of 1 massive steel floor support as a result of a low heat office fire in one of the most reinforced buildings in the world this entire building collapsed into its own foot print in less then 7 seconds.
If what they say is true you would not be able to put wood in your fireplace without it pulverising within 20 (the time an average office fire stays in one place and burns everything up) minutes. you would not be able to cook on your electric cooker because the elements would pulverise in to dust within 20 minutes.
That shower you take in your aluminium (melting point way lower than steel) shower? Forget it, no way 10 minutes and it would be gone. Thermal expansion you know.
So if the NIST is giving us this pathetic excuse for a rapport on the collapse of WTC 7than what else have they been wrong about?
Especially since three or four independent laboratories have corroborated the finds of prefessor Jones about there being thermite in the dust from the two Twin Towers and WTC 7
My dear mother in law of almost 80 just called me up to tell me that the NIST rapport was actually mentioned in the Waikato times. In the middle of the middle section, some were buried. The WTC 7 collapse was part of the biggest attack on the US. Two Kiwi’s were killed that day and New Zealand has send some 160 soldiers each year to Afghanistan as a result of the attacks on that day.It has taken the federal NIST 7 years to find out what happened to the building. I would have thought that it warranted front page billing.
Of course not many Kiwi’s actually know there was a third building which collapsed at the WTC site named “ground Zero” on 911.This building was WTC 7. A 47 floor steel framed high rise it collapsed around 5:20 local time. The time most Kiwi’s would be deep asleep and since the pictures were only shown on that day; life and uncontrollable only those actually watching the events life on that day have any recollection of its collapse in freefall speed of less than 6.5 seconds. It has taken the NIST seven years and three years of “intensive” study to come up with an explanation as to why this steel framed Skyscraper, the only one ever, would collapse into a pyroclastic flow in 6.5 seconds in freefall speed into it’s own footprint with the steel columns and floor span systems in neat lengths ready to be loaded up on trucks and shipped off to China for recycling. Apparently some of it turned up in Olympics games mementos. You can see the collapse here:
So how could this have happened?
Thanks to a newly discovered law of physics by the National Institute of Standards and Technology or NIST it is now possible for all of us to become a controlled demolition expert. All you need is a couple of gallons of gasoline, start a couple of office fires and wait for the building to collapse neatly into its own footprint. I think I will apply for a permit on Monday and start my new business imploding buildings because I love to see buildings implode and I hear you can ask big bucks to do it.
This amazing phenomenon is the “fourth law of movement” or the “NIST law of movement“. According to the scientists at NIST a key factor leading to the eventual collapse of WTC 7 was thermal expansion of long-span floor systems at temperatures “hundreds of degrees below those typically considered in current practice for fire resistance ratings. In other words; the LONG-span floor systems heated up due to low temperature office fires and magically expanded and broke all the welded connections around a column, the column unsupported started to buckle and bingo, cascading floor collapses ensued bring the building down into its own footprint within 7 sec.
I would like to name this new phenomenon the Hulkification Phenomenon in honour of the comic book figure “the hulk”. Who every time he got overheated with justified indignation would bulk up, turn green and go on a rampage.
As the comic book character the Hulkification Phenomenon shares another important characteristic with the Hulk; it suspends Newtons laws of Physics. An awesome feat I hope you will agree with me. Everything we have taken for granted for all these centuries and worded so simply, poof up in smoke and we have NIST to thank for discovering it; The Hulkification Phenomenon.
But serious, is this how it could have happened?
Let’s start at the beginning: What was WTC 7 and perhaps more important what was housed in WTC 7?
WTC 7 was a huge 47 floor Sky scraper higher than the Sky tower in Auckland. It was house to amongst others a CIA head quarter and Giuliani’s safety bunker. The building had been strengthened to the point that it could withstand a nuclear blast and it was build like a building within a building, this is what Larry Silverstein had to say about it:
”We built in enough redundancy to allow entire portions of floors to be removed without affecting the building’s structural integrity, on the assumption that someone might need double-height floors,” said Larry Silverstein, president of the company.
Yet NIST would have us believe that due to a unique construction the building could pulverise in mid air within 7 sec. due to low heat office fires that burn around 20 minutes in any given environment until the office contents have burned up after which it goes on to burn somewhere else.
Added to that the rapport and other material the NIST offers is so meagre in support for their bizarre claim that it is almost as if they have given up and are trying to tell people that their “Investigations are a total sham.
But then the NIST tells us that computer modelling and testing was enough to be able to draw their conclusions. That is all fine but then show us the computer models used and show us why their conclusions are scientific and conclusive yet they offer only an unscientific video animation.
What is also strange is that the NIST is contradicting the FEMA and Popular Mechanics magazine. Traditionally the PM and FEMA and NIST support each others theories and try to form a front but the NIST rejects the “gutted building’ Theory PM offered and the “raging fire” that FEMA proposed.
Remember it was raging fires that collapsed the Twin Towers.
In the mean time Richard Gage and his Team of Architects and Engineers have already rebutted the NIST’s claims and we can expect a full analysis from the around the 7th of September just in time to take it to the streets on the 11th.
In closing I would like to invite you to watch this haunting interview with Barry Jennings, a black Muslim man in charge of some of the security around the complex as he recounts the events of that day when he with Mr. Hass ended up locked up in building 7 after a huge explosion blew out the first 6 floors in the morning of 911.